Talmudology for Sukkot~ Take Two Etrogim, and Call Me in the Morning: The Citron as Medicine.

In honor of Sukkot, which begins on Friday night, here is a treat from the Talmudology archives.

שבת שלום וחג שמח

The Midrash tells a story of a man who was so generous with his charitable donations that he had no money left to feed his own family. Out of ideas, he did what I suppose anyone in his position would have done. He went to gather up discarded etrogim [the citron taken as part of the four species on the Festival of Sukkot] and went to see a king.

ויקרא רבה לו:ה

, וְנִתְבַּיֵּישׁ לֵילֵךְ לְבֵיתוֹ הָלַךְ לוֹ לְבֵית הַכְּנֶסֶת, חָמָא תַּמָּן מִן אִלֵּין אֶתְרוֹגַיָא דְּמֵינוּקַיָא מְקַלְקְלֵי בְּיוֹם הוֹשַׁעְנָא, וּתְנִינַן תַּמָּן מִיָּד הַתִּינוֹקוֹת שׁוֹמְטִין לוּלָבֵיהֶן וְאוֹכְלִים אֶתְרוֹגֵיהֶם, נְסַב מִנְּהוֹן וּמְלָא יָת סַקָּא וְהָלַךְ לִפְרשׁ בַּיָּם הַגָּדוֹל, עַד שֶׁהִגִּיעַ לִמְדִינַת הַמֶּלֶךְ, כֵּיוָן שֶׁהִגִּיעַ שָׁם אַרָעַת שַׁעְתָּא וְאִשְׁתְּכַח מַלְכָּא חָשֵׁשׁ מֵעוֹי, אָמְרִין לֵיהּ בְּחֶלְמָא אַסְוָתָךְ אֱכֹל מִן אִלֵּין אֶתְרוֹגִין דִּיהוּדָאי מַצְלִין עִמְּהוֹן בְּיוֹם הוֹשַׁעְנָא וְאַתְּ מִתְּסֵי, פִּשְׁפְּשִׁין בְּהַהוּא שַׁעְתָּא לְכָל אִלְפַיָא וּלְכָל מְדִינְתָּא וְלָא אַשְׁכְּחוּן, אָזְלִין וְאַשְׁכְּחוּן לְהַהוּא גַבְרָא יָתֵיב עַל סַקָּא, אָמְרִין לֵיהּ אִית גַּבָּךְ כְּלוּם, אֲמַר לָהֶם גְּבַר מִסְכֵּן אֲנָא וְלֵית גַּבִּי כְּלוּם לִמְזַבְּנָא, פִּשְׁפְּשׁוּ בְּסַקָּא וְאַשְׁכְּחוּן מִן אִלֵּין אֶתְרוֹגִין, וַאֲמָרִין לֵיהּ אִלֵּין מָה הֵן, אֲמַר לוֹן מִן אִלֵּין דִּיהוּדָאי מַצְלֵי בְּיוֹם הוֹשַׁעְנָא, אַטְעָנוּן סַקָּא וְאַעֲלוּהָ קֳדָם מַלְכָּא, אָכַל מַלְכָּא אִלֵּין אֶתְרוֹגַיָיא וְאִתְּסֵי. פַּנּוּן שַׂקָּא וּמְלָאוּהָ דִינָרִין…

…He was ashamed to go to his home. He went to the synagogue and saw there some of the citrons that the children away... He took some of them and filled a sack, and embarked on a voyage in the Mediterranean Sea until he reached the province of the king. When he arrived there, it happened to be that the king had an intestinal illness. They said to him in a dream: ‘Your cure is to eat from those citrons with which the Jews pray on the day of the hoshana, and you will be cured.’ At that time, they searched all the ships and all the provinces, but could not find any. They went and found that man sitting on the sack. They said to him: ‘Do you have anything?’ He said to them: ‘I am a poor man and I have nothing to sell.’ They searched the sack and found those citrons. They said to him: ‘What are they?’ He said to them: ‘From those with which the Jews pray on the day of the hoshana.’ They loaded the sack and took it in before the king. The king ate those citrons and he was cured. They emptied the sack and filled it with dinars..

The etrog as medicine? Yes. People once believed, and many still believe today, that the etrog has medicinal uses. So in honor of Sukkot, let’s talk about some of them.

The Etrog in Ma’aseh Tuviah

The etrog as a medicine appears in one of the first Jewish encyclopedias, written by Tuviah Hacohen. He studied in a yeshivah in Cracow, and at the age of twenty-six, entered the University of Frankfurt, where he began to study medicine. Despite being taken under the wing of Fredrick William, the elector of Brandenburg, and receiving a stipend from him, anti-Jewish sentiment prevented Tuviah from graduating. As a result, he left for the University of Padua, where he graduated with a degree in medicine in 1683 and soon found employment as a physician in Turkey. He published his only work, Ma’aseh Tuviah (The Work of Tuviah), in Venice in 1708 and moved in 1715 to Jerusalem, where he died in 1729.

Tuviah Cohen has long been a favorite of historians of science and Judaism. Perhaps this is because he was a reformer of sorts, ready to sweep away old superstitions and replace them with scientific knowledge. Perhaps it is because his book, Ma’aseh Tuviah, was “... the best-illustrated Hebrew medical work of the pre-modern era,” full of wonderful drawings about astronomy and anatomy. Perhaps it is because his book is so clearly printed and a pleasure to read in the original. Or perhaps it is because Cohen was so adamantly opposed to Copernicus that he called him the “Firstborn of Satan”– which made his the first Hebrew work to attack Copernicus and his heliocentric system.

In any event, Tuviah wrote about the wonderful healing properties of the etrog.

Ma'aseh Tuviah, Venice 1708, 146a.

Because in homes that have abundant medicines they also have the five special fruits through with the Land of Israel was blessed, I will write in praise of the of etrog [פרי עץ הדר] which is more beautiful than any other fruit…. both the peel and the fruit itself are delicious to eat, and it also has many wonderful properties [סגולות נפלאות]. The peel alleviates all internal pain and strengthens the muscles. while the white of the fruit strengthens the internal organs. Its bitter taste is good for the liver, and cures thirst. The seeds are also good for internal pain as an an aid for digestion…it is as good as theriac for any person who is ill, and it is particularly beneficial for children with viral infections [ויראוליס] like smallpox. The wood of the tree itself does not have these qualities though without doubt it imparts them to the fruit, which is why the fruit never falls far from the tree [התפוח אינו נופל רחוק מן העץ]. And so if there is a scarcity of the fruit, cut some wood from the etrog tree and boil. It will strengthen the body and a serve to heal the soul.

The Etrog as a Cure for Cholera

We have had occasion in the past to talk about Hayyim Palagi (there are many different ways to spell his last name, 1788– 1868) who was a rabbi and leader of the Jewish community in Izmir (Smyrna), Turkey, though his influence was felt far beyond. Writing about the 1865 cholera outbreak in Turkey, Rabbi Palagi recalled how the Jews had fled Izmir.

In our town of Izmir in 5625 [= 1865] there was an outbreak of cholera, just like the outbreak of 5592 [= 1832] and many fled. The few who remained in the town were expelled by the mayor on the advice of physicians, and left for a nearby mountainside where men, women and children camped, and remained for about three weeks. There was not a single case of cholera the entire time,and the outbreak in the town eventually ended. During that time, I was particular with my prayers, and I prayed to God in the merit of Abraham who was called “a mountain” . . . that the merit of our ancestors would protect us and that we would not fall ill. And so it was. Praise be to God, for his loving kindness endures forever.

I am lucky to own a copy of one of his many works, called Refuah Vehayyim, published in Izmir in 1874. (It even contains three handwritten annotations in the margins written by Rabbi Palagi’s youngest son Yosef.) And here is what you can find on page 12b (though alas, there are no marginalia).

Sefer Refuah Vehayyim, Izmir 1874. 12b. (Chapter 4 #2).

It is written in the name of our teacher Rabbi Hayyim Vital, that to cure cholera take distilled water and the resin of the (?) mastic tree…and take half a cup of the size used for kiddush…and boil it with the resin and give it to the patient. And this is guaranteed.

And it is writtn in the Sefer Otzar Hayyim that this works with etrog peel…

Later in the book, Rabbi Palagi wrote that the etrog can be used for stomach aches in general, and not just those associated with cholera. However, it cannot be any old citron; it must be an etrog used for the mitzvah of lulav and etrog on Sukkot:

Sefer Refuah Vehayyim, Izmir 1874. 51b

For a stomach ache: the remedy is to eat etrogim with were used for the mitzvah of lulav and etrog during the holiday and through Hoshanah Rabbah. For they are used in prayer, and they heal…sometimes they are hard to digest, in which case they should be peeled and then boiled, and then that water should be drunk.

But wait - there’s more

In another of his many books Mo’ed Lekol Chai, Rabbi Palagi recommended the etrog as a means for easing the pains and dangers of childbirth. He cited another work in which this suggestion appeared, though in a slightly different and shorter form. (That work is Nazir Shimshon, published by Ya’akov Shimshon Shabtai Sinigaliah in Pisa in 1783. It is on page 38.)

When a women is pregnant, she should take the etrog on Hosha’ana Rabbah and after removing the pittom [style] she should distribute charity to the poor each according to her means, and she should pray that God should should save her and that her child should be born healthy.

The reason for this is that there is an opinion that the Tree of Knowledge was an etrog, and when Eve ate from it, Death came into the world. We know that many women die during childbirth, and therefore they should undertake this ritual and say the following prayer:

Master of the Universe, you know that because Chava [Eve] ate from the Tree of Knowledge she sinned and brought Death to the world as well as the pains of childbirth. Had I been there at that time I would not have eaten from it and I would not have benefitted from it in any way, just as I did not want to blemish the etrog during the Festival [of Sukkot] But now I have blemished it, because now it is no longer a mitzvah to take it. I would never want to disobey your mitzvot. Please accept my prayer and my supplication that I should not die as a result of this child or as a result of childbirth. Save me, grant me an easy labor without pain or hardship and let no harm befall me or my child, for you are the God who saves…

And so any man whose wife is pregnant during Sukkot should arrange for her to take the etrog and give it to his wife and she should follow this procedure. She should say this prayer word for word and conclude by saying “let this infant bring contentment and not pain, and may it be born to a good and peaceful life. Amen.”

Hayyim Pilagi, Mo'ed Lekol Chai Jerusalem 1976 #25.

The Etrog increases Male potency

The etrog. It’s not just for women. In the anonymous collection of segulot called Sefer Refuot published in Vienna in 1926, we find the following recommendation:

Sefer Refuot, Vienna 1926

For increased virility, take four drahms of the tongue of an ox together with half a handful of etrog peel and half a drahm of girofilo

Good to know.

Not so Fast - Chaim Bachrach and his objection

Rabbi Yair Hayyim Bachrach (1638-1702) better known by his famous work the Chavot Yair, was a leading posek of his generation, and led the communities of Worms and Mainz. In his commentary on the Tur (הלכות לולב #664) he also noted the custom of pregnant women biting off the pittom of the etrog, and he was not happy about it. Not at all.

It is the custom of pregnant women to bite off the tip of the etrog and it is mentioned in the Tzenah Urenah.How fortunate we are that this custom has been utterly uprooted.

Jewish Etrogs, and Greek Etrogs

The belief in the medicinal properties of the etrog was not unique to our ancestors alone. The Greeks believed it too. In fact, it was they who gave the fruit we know as an etrog a name that reflects just this; they called it Citrus Medica, “the medical citrus" and that is the Latin name of the species to this day. Citrus Medica.

Gaius Plinius Secundus (AD 23/24–79) better known as Pliny the Elder held the cirton tree in very high esteem as demonstrated by this passage in his Natural History (Book XII chapter 7):

The citron tree, called the Assyrian, and by some the Median apple, is an antidote against poisons. The leaf is similar to that of the arbute, except that it has small prickles running across it. As to the fruit, it is never eaten, but it is remarkable for its extremely powerful smell, which is the case, also, with the leaves; indeed, the odour is so strong, that it will penetrate clothes, when they are once impregnated with it, and hence it is very useful in repelling the attacks of noxious insects. The tree bears fruit at all seasons of the year; while some is falling off, other fruit is ripening, and other, again, just bursting into birth. Various nations have attempted to naturalize this tree among them, for the sake of its medical properties, by planting it in pots of clay, with holes drilled in them, for the purpose of introducing the air to the roots;

The Chinese Etrog

To this day, the etrog is used as a medicine in China. They grow several different varieties including the world’s largest citrus, the “Ning’er Giant. And, as the photo below shows, it really is giant.

 

“Ning’er Giant” citron weighing about 17lb (8kg), held in the gentle hands of the farmer who grew it, Li Hua Zhong, near Ning’er Yunan. (Photo credit David Karp, 18 October 2011.)

 

Some varieties are grown for their antioxidant properties, while others supposedly release insulin, which may be of use in Type II diabetes. In fact, according to a 2012 Review on Phytochemical and Pharmacological Properties of Citrus medica Linn, the etrog will cure just about anything.

Result shows that Citrus medica Linn. possesses analgesic, hypoglycaemic, anticholinesterase, anticancer, antidiabetic, hypocholesterolemic, hypolipidemic, insulin Secretagogue, anthelmintic, antimicrobial antiulcer and estrogenic properties.

And presumably, all without any side effects! The Jinguu variety from southern Yunnan is used to treat respiratory disorders, whereas the Qingpi variety, grown in the Provinces of Zhejiang and Jianxi is used for its more general medicinal effects.

Citrus Fruits and the First Randomized controlled Medical Trial

The citrus (but not the etrog, sadly) made a surprising appearance in the first randomized controlled clinical trial that humanity conducted. In the 18th century, sailors in the British Navy, went without fresh fruit for long periods of time. Citrus fruits contain the essential Vitamin C also known as ascorbic acid. Without it you develop a very nasty disease called scurvy. There is lethargy, the hair and teeth fall out, the gums bleed spontaneously, and bruising appears. Without treatment, you die. So yes, it is very nasty.

Sailors were often at sea for months at a time, without access to fruit containing Vitamin C. In the 18th century, it is estimated that more British sailors died from scurvy than died in battle.

For reasons we won’t go into here, a Scottish naval Surgeon named James Lind (1716-1794) had a hunch that the disease was cured by a lack of whatever it was that citrus fruits contained. So he took 12 sailors with scurvy and fed them various experimental diets that included one enriched with oranges and lemons (but not etrogs), and compared them to a similar group of sailors who ate a regular Royal Navy diet. The results were startling.

On the 20th of May 1747, I selected twelve patients in the scurvy, on board the Salisbury at sea. Their cases were as similar as I could have them. They all in general had putrid gums, the spots and lassitude, with weakness of the knees. They lay together in one place, being a proper apartment for the sick in the fore-hold; and had one diet common to all, viz. water gruel sweetened with sugar in the morning; fresh mutton-broth often times for dinner; at other times light puddings, boiled biscuit with sugar, etc., and for supper, barley and raisins, rice and currants, sago and wine or the like. Two were ordered each a quart of cyder a day. Two others took twenty-five drops of elixir vitriol three times a day … Two others took two spoonfuls of vinegar three times a day … Two of the worst patients were put on a course of sea-water … Two others had each two oranges and one lemon given them every day … The two remaining patients, took … an electary recommended by a hospital surgeon … The consequence was, that the most sudden and visible good effects were perceived from the use of oranges and lemons; one of those who had taken them, being at the end of six days fit for duty … The other was the best recovered of any in his condition; and … was appointed to attend the rest of the sick. Next to the oranges, I thought the cider had the best effects…

The most sudden and visible good effects were perceived from the use of oranges and lemons; one of those who had taken them being at the end of six days fit for duty … The other was the best recovered of any in his condition; and being now deemed pretty well, was appointed nurse to the rest of the sick.

Lind demonstrated that citrus fruits prevented and cured scurvy, and the first randomized controlled clinical trial, now the gold standard for evaluating new drugs, was born. Even Rabbi Bachrach would not have objected to that.

The etrog, whose Latin name means medicine, has long been a symbol of healing, not only in our own tradition, but in others, some just as ancient. After all, everyone needs a little healing.

Print Friendly and PDF

Bechorot 8a ~ Rashi on Mermaids

This post is for the page of Talmud we will study on Shabbat, the first Day of Sukkot.

While analysing the rules regarding the treatment of a firstborn donkey, the Talmud is sidetracked into a discussion of the breeding techniques of various animals.

בכורות ח, א

הדולפנין פרין ורבין כבני אדם מאי דולפנין אמר רב יהודה בני ימא

Dolphins reproduce like people. The Gemara asks: What are dolphins? Rav Yehuda says: They are creatures that are called sons of the sea.

And what exactly are those “sons of the sea”? Here is the explanation of the great French commentator Rashi (1040-1105):

דגים יש בים שחציין צורת אדם וחציין צורת דג ובלע"ז שריינ"א

There are certain fish in the ocean; half of the body has a human form, and half has the form of a fish. In French it is called a sereine.

Mermaids in early Greek and Rabbinic Literature

Today in French the word sirène means a mermaid, just as it did in the time of Rashi. And Sirenia is the scientific name for an order of aquatic herbivorous mammals such the manatee, which have a sort-of-human- form (if you don’t look too closely). But Rashi lived about five hundred years after the redaction of the Talmud, and so his explanation might not be exactly what R. Yehuda had in mind. However, the Sifra, the halakhic midrash (legal exegesis) on Leviticus, also mentions a sea creature called the sirene. And the Sifra was composed sometime before 350 CE, about 700 years before Rashi lived. The Sifra notes that when the Torah lists the aquatic animals that cannot be eaten (Lev. 11:10) it includes the seranit (הסרנית).

ספרא שמיני, ג:ז

'חיה' – זו חית הים; 'הנפש' – להביא את הסרנית‏. יכול תהיה מטמא באהל כדברי ר' חנינא? תלמוד לומר (במדבר יט, יד): זאת

In Greek literature, the sirens were dangerous sea creatures whose sensuous voice would lure sailors to their deaths. These stories appear Homer’s in the epic poem the Odyssey, composed around 800 BCE, which is to say, around 500 years before the composition of the Sifra. The point is, the legend of the mermaid has been around was around long, long before Rashi described them in his commentary. And it continued for many centuries after.

A manatee, or a mermaid?

A manatee, or a mermaid?

Christopher Columbus saw mermaids

Christopher Columbus (yes, the one who “discovered” America) saw mermaids. Three of them. In an entry in his diary dated January 9th 1493 he wrote he had sighted three mermaids “which rose well out of the sea; but they are not so beautiful as they are painted, though to some extent they have the form of a human face.” These were most likely dugong, which has a fusiform body with no dorsal fin or hind limbs, and flippers in place of arms.

“Since once I sat upon a promontory,
And heard a mermaid on a dolphin’s back
Uttering such dulcet and harmonious breath,
That the rude sea grew civil at her song:
And certain stars shot madly from their spheres,
To hear the sea-maid’s music.”
— William Shakespeare, A Midsummer Night's Dream Act II, scene 1.

More Modern sightings of Mermaids

Mermaid sightings continued. In 1881 there were reports of of them in the Susquehanna River in York, Pennsylvania. Actually, there were five sightings, though all made by the same fisherman, a Mr. Henry Loucks, on what was, apparently, a slow news day:

Newspaper report Mermaids1881.jpg

He says it comes to the surface, looks about it, then gradually sinks down leaving its hair floating on top of the water for a moment or so and finally disappears.  It has the face of a woman and beautiful glossy black hair, but as it only shows itself down to the shoulders, he cannot tell what the other end is like.

He says he could shoot it but is afraid he might be arrested and tried for murder, and it would bring him into trouble.  On being asked if it had a comb or looking glass with it.  “It might have had, but he didn’t see it” and supposes it has a cave somewhere in the bottom of the river under the deep water.

Mr. Henry Loucks, the fisherman above alluded to, is well known in town, and he is considered as reliable as any fisherman on the river.  We are in hopes that the mermaid may be captured alive, if possible, or dead, if it cannot be had any other way, and guarantee him a safe delivery out of his troubles if he shoots it.


mermaids in the writings of the Chida, and in P.T. Barnum’s Museum

Chaim Yosef Dovid Azulai, known as the Chidah (1724-1806) was a rabbi, kabbalist, prolific scholar and major fundraiser for the Jewish settlement on Jerusalem. In his encyclopedic Midbar Kademut he described the same siren we read in Rashi on today’s page of Talmud, but with some additional flourishes.

דג יש בים שקורין סירינ"ה מחציו ולמעלה כדמות אשה בתולה ומחציו ולמטה כתבנית דג ומקום משכנה בסלעים ומקומות מסוכנים בים ומדי עבור איזה ספינה תתחיל לשורר ולזמר בקול נעים הרבה עד כי תפיל חבלי שינה על כל אנשי האניה, ואחר כך נכנסת לתוכה והורגת ואוכלת יושביה

The top part of the body is that of a young woman, the bottom that of a fish. It lives among rocks in dangerous places, and when a ship passses it begins to sings with a beautiful voice, until the sailors are overtaken with sleep. After that it climbs on board, and kills and eats everyone…

The Feejee Mermaid

Among the many weird creatures that P.T. Barnum displayed in his famous museum in 1842, one of the most well known was the Feejee (or Fiji )Mermaid, which was, in fact, the body of a young monkey sewn onto the trunk of a fish. It was apparently purchased from some Japanese sailors (for $6,000!) and later brought to America, but it quickly dropped out of sight. There were rumors that it had been lost in one of the three fires that gutted Barnum’s collections over the years, but a creature in Harvard’s Peabody Museum may actually be the one from P.T Barnum’s collection.

One of the earliest depictions of the specimen that was to become the Feejee Mermaid, in the collections of the British Library (Asia, Pacific & Africa P/T 2937). Courtesy and copyright,The British Library Board. From Mermaids Uncovered. Journal…

One of the earliest depictions of the specimen that was to become the Feejee Mermaid, in the collections of the British Library (Asia, Pacific & Africa P/T 2937). Courtesy and copyright,The British Library Board. From Mermaids Uncovered. Journal of Museum Ethnography, no. 27 (2014), pp. 98-116

Rav Yehuda, Rashi, and the Chida didn’t make up the legend of the mermaid. It existed for many centuries before they recorded it, and judging by this report in Haaretz, sightings of mermaids are likely to be with us for many centuries to come.

“Is a Mermaid Living Under the Sea in Northern Israel?

Some residents of Kiryat Yam are convinced the city is home to a mermaid, and the town’s local council is offering $1 million to anyone who can prove the aquatic damsel exists.

Over recent months, dozens of people in the Haifa suburb have reported seeing a creature that resembles a young girl leaping out of the water and doing aerial tricks across the waves before disappearing to her home under the sea.

The story has caused quite a splash in Kiryat Yam, with dozens of onlookers flocking to the town’s beach at sunset, cameras in tow, to catch a glimpse of the mermaid and hopefully, the million dollar photo.”
— Haaretz.com, December 8, 2009
Print Friendly and PDF

Bechorot 7a ~ Pig x Sheep

This post is for the page of Talmud we will study on Friday.

(There’s a lot going on this week.)

On this page of Talmud there is a debate regarding the crossbreeding of different species, and the possibility that a non-kosher animal (say, a pig) could fertilize a kosher animal (like a sheep):

בכורות ז, א

והאמר ר' יהושע בן לוי לעולם אין מתעברת לא טמאה מן הטהור ולא טהורה מן הטמא ולא גסה מן הדקה ולא דקה מן הגסה ולא בהמה מן חיה ולא חיה מן בהמה חוץ מר' אליעזר ומחלוקתו שהיו אומרים חיה מתעברת מבהמה

...R. Yehoshua ben Levi said: A non-kosher female can never conceive from a kosher male, nor a kosher female from a non-kosher male, nor a large animal from a small animal, nor a small animal from a large animal, nor a domesticated animal from a non-domesticated animal, nor a non-domesticated animal from a domesticated animal, except for R. Eliezer and his disputant [in Chulin 79b], who claimed that a non-domesticated animal can conceive from a domesticated animal...(Bechorot 7a)

Here is the Talmud in Bava Kama that records that view of “R. Eliezer and his disputant.”

בבא קמא עז, ב – עח, א

ואמר רבא זה בנה אב כל מקום שנאמר שה אינו אלא להוציא את הכלאים ...אמר לך ר"א כי איתמר דרבא לטמא שנולד מן הטהור ועיבורו מן הטמא...וטהורה מטמאה מי מיעברא אין דקיי"ל דאיעבר מקלוט 

Rava said this establishes a model and teaches that wherever the term שה [seh] is stated in the Bible, it is meant to exclude a hybrid... R. Eliezer would say to you  - when did Rava state his model?  With respect to a non-kosher animal that was born from a kosher mother and a non-kosher father...But can a kosher animal conceive from a non-kosher animal? Yes, for it has been established that this case refers to a kosher animal that was conceived from a [kosher mutant animal that was] born with uncloven hooves. (Bava Kamma 77b-78a)

A pig in sheep's clothing? Nope. Just a pig.

A pig in sheep's clothing? Nope. Just a pig.

Here the Talmud claims that a non-kosher animal (say, a pig) could not fertilize a kosher animal (like a sheep). If an animal appears to have the features of a sheep-pig cross-breed, it is, in fact, the offspring of a kosher animal that is breed with another kosher animal but which looks non-kosher because of a mutation that causes it to have non-cloven hooves. Here is that case:

k= kosher; m= mutant, born with non-cloven hooves

k= kosher; m= mutant, born with non-cloven hooves

Which leads to the question of the day: Can a kosher animal indeed successfully breed with a non-kosher animal? Let's take a look.

When a pig loves a sheep

Pigs have been known to act, well, like pigs, and copulate with sheep. But could this lead to a baby peep, or ship, or whatever you'd like to call it? There are pictures that suggest this may be so, but in actual fact this pig with wool is the rare Hungarian Mangalitza pig, and has no sheep ancestry.  

At the beginning of the twentieth century, Foster Dwight Coburn, a farmer who also served as the secretary of the Kansas Department of Agriculture published Swine in America; a text-book for Breeder, Feeder and Student, and on page 63 he made the following observation: 

There exists in some sections of Old Mexico a type of “hog” represented as the product of crossing a ram with a sow, and the term “Cuino” has been applied to this rather violent combination. The ram used as a sire to produce the Cuino is kept with the hogs from the time he is weaned. A resident of Mexico has given the following description of the Cuino: “The sow used to produce the Cuino belongs to any race, but as a rule to the Razor-Back family, which is the more numerous. There is never any difficulty with her accepting the ram when breeding time comes. The progeny is a pig—unmistakably a pig—with the form and all the characteristics of the pig, but he is entirely different from his dam if she is a Razor-Back. He is round-ribbed and blocky, his short legs cannot take him far from his sty, and his snout is too short to root with. His head is not unlike that of the Berkshire. His body is covered with long, thick, curly hair, not soft enough to be called wool, but which nevertheless he takes from his sire. His color is black, white-black, and white-brown and white. He is a good grazer and is mostly fed on grass with one or two ears of corn a day, and on these he fattens quickly. The Cuino reproduces itself, and is often crossed a second and third time with a ram. Be it what it may, the Cuino is the most popular breed of hogs in the state of Oaxaca, and became so on account of their propensity to fatten on little food.”

It may have been the most popular pig breed in Oxaca, but it was still rather an oddity in the US; newspapers found them interesting, as evidenced by two reports, from 1902 and 1908 about sheep-pig hybrids.  

The Minneapolis Journal, September 24, 1902, from here.

The Minneapolis Journal, September 24, 1902, from here.

Los Angeles Herald. October 3, 1908, from here.

Los Angeles Herald. October 3, 1908, from here.

Species and interbreeding

Despite these reports, it would seem that the rule suggested by R. Yehoshua ben Levi is correct. Different species cannot successfully interbreed, because, well, because that's the definition of a species, as the Oxford English Dictionary makes clear:

A group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding. The species is the principal natural taxonomic unit, ranking below a genus and denoted by a Latin binomial, e.g., Homo sapiens.

So although it is a tautology, you get the idea: a species by definition can only breed with other members of its own species. If a pig and a sheep could breed and have offspring, they'd be members of the same species. But they are not. Pigs belong to genus Sus, and the species Scrofa, whereas sheep belong to the genus Ovis and the species Aries. Pigs have 38 chromosomes, and sheep have 54.  So they cannot cross-breed.  (Lions and tigers both have 38 chromosomes, so they can cross breed, and produce a liger.)

But it's not as simple as that.  Even if you don't have the same number of chromosomes, you can still sometimes breed outside your species. Horses have 64 chromosomes and donkeys have 62. Yet they can cross breed, resulting in a mule (if mom was a horse) or a hinny (if mum was a donkey), although both are nearly always sterile. Horses belong to the genus Equus and the species ferus, and donkeys belong to the same genus but to a different species, africanus.  Yet they can interbreed.  Which raises the question: should a horse and a donkey be re-classified as belonging to the same species? But that would be odd, because they look so different and act in very different ways.

These kinds of questions  are perplexing, and have challenged the world of biology since the time of Carl Linnaeus (d. 1778) who gave the world a way of categorizing and naming all living things called binomial nomenclature. Briefly it goes like this: the grey wolf belongs to the genus Canis and the species lupus.  Dogs belong to the same genus, Canis, and are a subspecies of wolves, so their scientific name is Canis lupus familiaris (which I suppose makes it a trinomial nomenclature).  We belong to the genus Homo and the species sapiens, whereas chimpanzees belong to a different genus and species, Pan troglodytes. Anyway just what gets a creature into one species class or another is a really challenging question, one that is still being played out in the scientific literature. There's even a 320 page book from the University of California Press in which the author "provides a new perspective on the relationship between philosophical and biological approaches" to the concept of a species. For now, though, R. Yehoshua ben Levi's generalization found in Bechorot is pretty close to the Linnaean taxonomy we use today.  We can also conclude that the general rule of the Talmud from today's daf, that a kosher animal could not successfully breed with a non-kosher one, is a pretty good rule of thumb.

“Every living thing loves its like,
and every person his own sort.
All creatures flock together with their kind.”
— Ecclesiasticus, 13:15.

 

[Repost from Bava Kama 77.]

Print Friendly and PDF

Talmudology on the Parsha, Ha’azinu ~ Shabbat Shuva and Pandemic Behavior

As we speed towards Yom Kippur, we encounter the poetic parsha of Ha’azinu. It is a fire and brimstone poem, in which God threatens his people with all kinds of misfortunes because they abandoned his teachings:

דברים 32:15

וַיִּשְׁמַ֤ן יְשֻׁרוּן֙ וַיִּבְעָ֔ט שָׁמַ֖נְתָּ עָבִ֣יתָ כָּשִׂ֑יתָ וַיִּטֹּשׁ֙ אֱל֣וֹהַּ עָשָׂ֔הוּ וַיְנַבֵּ֖ל צ֥וּר יְשֻׁעָתֽוֹ׃        

So Jeshurun [i.e. Israel] grew fat and kicked—
You grew fat and gross and coarse—
They forsook the God who made them
And spurned the Rock of their support.

It is within this context that we read the verse on which we will focus our attention:

32:25 דברים

מִחוּץ֙ תְּשַׁכֶּל־חֶ֔רֶב וּמֵחֲדָרִ֖ים אֵימָ֑ה גַּם־בָּחוּר֙ גַּם־בְּתוּלָ֔ה יוֹנֵ֖ק עִם־אִ֥ישׁ שֵׂיבָֽה׃        

The sword shall deal death without,
As shall the terror within,
To youth and maiden alike,
The suckling as well as the aged.

The rabbis of the Talmud used this verse as a proof text for al ruling about behavior during a pandemic:

בבא קמא ס,ב

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: דֶּבֶר בָּעִיר – כַּנֵּס רַגְלֶיךָ, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וְאַתֶּם לֹא תֵצְאוּ אִישׁ מִפֶּתַח בֵּיתוֹ עַד בֹּקֶר״. וְאוֹמֵר: ״לֵךְ עַמִּי בֹּא בַחֲדָרֶיךָ, וּסְגוֹר דְּלָתְךָ בַּעֲדֶךָ״. וְאוֹמֵר: ״מִחוּץ תְּשַׁכֶּל חֶרֶב, וּמֵחֲדָרִים אֵימָה״.

The Sages taught: If there is plague in the city, gather your feet, [i.e., limit the time you spend out of the house,] as it is stated in the verse: “And none of you shall go out of the opening of his house until the morning” (Exodus 12:22). And it says in another verse: “Come, my people, enter into your chambers, and shut your doors behind you; hide yourself for a little moment, until the anger has passed by” (Isaiah 26:20). And it says: “Outside the sword will bereave, and in the chambers terror” (Deuteronomy 32:25).

STAY Home

The Talmud has brought three proof-texts that support the advice to stay indoors during a pandemic. In the opening words of this important passage, the Talmud reverses what came to be the standard medical practice of isolating the sick. Instead, it isolated the healthy. Of course, the effect is the same: there is no contact between those who are ill and those who are well, but since there are usually many more healthy people than there are sick, the effort and social disruption of isolation of the former will be much greater.This talmudic intervention is also one that is now all too familiar to us from the widespread lockdowns and stay-at-home orders that began in 2020 during the COVID- 19 pandemic.

…Or don’t stay home

The talmudic advice to stay at home during an epidemic outbreak was ignored by later commentators and those who wrote the halakhic codes of Jewish law. commentators on the Talmud added their own rulings about social isolation during a pandemic. The Polish exegete Rabbi Shmuel Eidels known by his acronym as Maharsha (1555– 1631) wrote that the rabbis of the Talmud could not have been suggesting that one should not flee from the locus of a pandemic.

This is certainly not the case, because if there is an outbreak of plague in a town it is best to leave and flee for one’s life. Rather, the intent of the Talmud is that if one cannot flee, then do not go outside into the streets.

The Maharsha’s ruling was precicely the opposite of that in Bava Kamma.

In true talmudic fashion, this comment of the Maharsha was itself commented on by a later rabbi, Yosef Hayyim from Baghdad (1835– 1909) who is better known by the title of his major work on Jewish law, Ben Ish Hai. In his commentary on the Talmud, he wrote that

the words of the Maharsha are only applicable to [bubonic] plague. But in the case of cholera, even when arrangements could be made to care for a sick person at home, it is best to flee the city. Because cholera also frightens a person, and he can be consumed by the illness on account of this fear . . . Therefore it is best to flee far away so that his ears cannot hear and his eyes cannot see the sickness that rules over everyone, lest he be overtaken with fear, and he himself be taken, God forbid.

Several other medieval commentators ruled like Maharsha. They include Rabbi Ya’akov ben Moshe Moellin (c. 1365– 1427) who is better known by his acronym Maharil; the Polish Rabbi Shlomo Luria (1510–1573), better known as Maharshal, (who descended from a family line that it was claimed could be traced back to Rashi, and whose mother was herself a Talmudist of some repute); The Sefer Hasidim (The Book of the Pious), a collection of folk stories, customs, and ethical adjurations that originated in the German Jewish community around Regensberg in the thirteenth century; and the Polish Rabbi Moshe Isserles (1530– 1572), known as Rema. Without doubt the work of his that had the greatest influence on Ashkenazi Jewry was his gloss on the Shulhan Arukh, which had been written by a Sephardic Jew, Joseph Caro (d. 1575). Isserles’ gloss is the authoritative reference work for Ashkenazi Jews. Less well known is the fact that as a young man, the Rema Isserles had himself fled from a plague. Here is his description of what had happened.

I Moshe, (son of my father the honorable benefactor and leader Israel, may he live long) called Isserles from Krakow, was exiled having left our city in [5]‌ 316 [= 1556] because of the polluted air (may it not befall us). We were sojourners in a land that was not ours in the city of Shidlov which has neither figs nor vines and there is barely any water to drink. . . we could not celebrate [the minor festival of] Purim with the usual joy and happiness. In order to remove the sadness and dejection I resolved to stand and take pride in my creativity, for my wisdom helped me . . . and so I decided to investigate and expound on the meaning of the Megillah [The Book of Esther].

Minghag becomes normative law

In what he described as a self- imposed exile, Isserles wrote a book called Mehir Yayyin [The Cost of Wine] which was published some three years later in 1559.This experience surely played a part when he wrote a legal commentary called Darkhei Moshe [The Paths of Moses]. He cited Maharil, of course, but then quoted a rather unexpected source. It was from the Zohar, the central mystical text of the kabbalah, which had been printed for the very first time in 1558, the year before Isserles fled from the epidemic in Krakow.

. . . It is likewise written in Zohar, Parashat Vayera Elav, that one should flee the city. And even though the Talmud states, “If there is plague in the city, gather your feet” [i.e., limit the time you spend out of the house,] it seems to me that fleeing is certainly better, but if one can go inside and not leave [he need not flee]. If this is not possible, he is required to flee. And the custom of Israel is Torah [i.e., this custom is now normative law].

Martin Luther and Muslim Law on Fleeing

To put the writings of Moshe Isserles, Maharil and Maharshah into context, we should pause to consider the work of the German priest Martin Luther (1483–1546). It is of course well known that Luther was, even by the standard of his own day, virulently anti- Semitic. However, his thoughts on fleeing from a pandemic allow a comparison across very two religious traditions.

In the summer of 1527, bubonic plague struck northern Germany and despite an order to leave, Luther stayed to minister to the sick. He then published a pamphlet titled On Whether One Has To Flee Death [Ob man fur dem sterben fliehen muge], which proved to be very popular; it was published in four separate editions in 1527 alone, and there were a further eleven editions over the next several decades. Luther adopted a position that was quite different from the Jewish responsa of the time, for he wrote that not all who flee from a pandemic acted correctly. Only some had. The decision depended both on who the person was and the degree of faith they possessed. “Christ does not want his weak ones to be abandoned,” he wrote, citing the New Testament.Luther made it clear that it was forbidden to flee if the goal was disobedience to God’s word or command. But if the motive was to avoid infection, some leaders might be able to flee if others remained to minister and to keep social order. Otherwise, abandoning the local community [Gemeinda] was a great sin. Luther cited the biblical story of Abraham “who feared death and escaped it [furcht er den Tod und floch yhn] through pretending Sarah was his sister.

Muslims, or at least Ottoman Muslims, also adopted a theological stand in which fleeing from a plague was acceptable. It is still a point of academic debate as to how much Muslim law permitted these actions. But regardless of the finer points of Muslim law, during the 1604 outbreak of plague in Constantinople, the Muftis fled, like everyone else.

Why Bother to flee?

What lay at the core of these rulings, which ever way they went, was the belief that pandemics are a divine response to human sin. If falling ill was a punishment, then what sense did it make to flee, as if by doing so, God could no-longer find you and strike you with bubonic plague or diphtheria?

This is also the central message of the Book of Jonah that we read in the afternoon of Yom Kippur. There is no escaping God’s presence, and no escaping his justice. On this Shabbat Shuva, what better message could there be?

Shabbat Shalom from Talmudology

Print Friendly and PDF