Small Gourds vs Big Gourds, or Cucumbers vs Gourds?
In the middle of a long excursion into property rights, we find this gem:
אמר אביי בוצינא טב מקרא
The ArtScroll Talmud (as well as the older Soncino English Talmud) translates this expression following Rashi:
Abayee said: A small gourd now is better than a large gourd later (Ketuvot 83b).
Here's how Rashi explains the concept:
בוצינא דלעת קטנה קרא דלעת גדולה והאומר לחבירו קח לך דלעת קטנה בגינתי או המתן עד שיגדילו וקח גדולה טוב לו ליקח הקטנה מיד כי לא ידע מה יולד יום
...When a person says to his friend "you may take this small gourd in my garden now or you can wait until it grows larger and then take it" it is better to take the small gourd immediately, because you cannot know what the future may bring.
This is a fairly unremarkable observation, and it finds a similar expression in the adage "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush." The meaning is clear: it's better to have a small but certain gain rather than risk a larger one that is less certain (though see here for an interesting alternative origin of the expression). This is Rashi's explanation. But there is another way to explain the phrase (and this is followed by the Koren-Steinsaltz Talmud). According to Tosafot, cited in the name of Rabbenu Tam (d.1171), Abayee's saying means the following:
ומשל הדיוט כך הוא שאדם אוהב הקישות יותר שיהנה בה מהרה ממה שהוא אוהב דלעת ולהמתינה אע"פ שהיא טובה יותר
This common saying means that a person would prefer [fast growing] cucumbers because he can enjoy them sooner, rather than gourds [which grow slowly and] which require waiting, even though they [taste] better. (Tosafot, בוצינא טב מקרא, Ketuvot 83b).
So according to the great Rabbenu Tam, Abayee's saying does not address any element of risk. Instead it is addressing the ability to have self-control and to plan for the future. The larger reward is certain, but is only available if you can wait. In fact, Rabbenu Tam is describing the famous Marshmallow Test.
The Marshmallow Test
The man behind the Marshmallow Test is the psychologist Walter Mischel, who was born in Vienna and fled to the US in 1938. The test is simple: give kindergarten children an option -one reward now (in the original experiments the children could choose any reward, not just a marshmallow) or two if you can sit and not touch the reward for fifteen minutes. The studies were performed at Stanford between 1968 and 1974 and involved some 550 children. If you haven't already seen what the test looks like, grab a coffee and watch the video. It's quite wonderful.
There have been dozens and dozens of academic papers written on the Marshmallow test, since Mischel first published his findings in 1969. But perhaps most surprisingly, the findings of the Marshmallow experiment on pre-schoolers seems to predict the future behaviors of the test subjects when they are adults. Here is Mischel summarizing his findings in his new book called (predictably enough,) The Marshmallow Test: Mastering Self-Control.
Wow. That's some test. But before you run out and test your preschool aged children (or grandchildren), remember that according to Tosafot, most people prefer a smaller instant reward to a larger but delayed reward. The classic Marshmallow Test measured how long young children could control their desires for an instant reward, but gives a new insight into this daf. If you can hold out for slow growing gourds rather than go for the faster growing cucumbers, you might just do very well in later life.